Today’s read is from Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow of the Heritage Foundation’s Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and the manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative. Here’s an excerpt:
Dinesh D’Souza’s new documentary, 2,000 Mules, raises serious questions about possible skullduggery in the 2020 election, involving absentee ballots across multiple states. But neither the liberal media, nor election officials, nor law enforcement seem to have much interest in investigating that potential wrongdoing. The reaction has largely boiled down to “nothing to see here!” or else to so-called “fact checks” that criticize the technology used to analyze the problems the film documents, rather than actually use the information D’Souza presents to investigate the credibility of the claims being made.
But that is par for the course these days when it comes to potential election fraud, or even proven fraud.The media’s refusal even to address or examine the issue is quite a change from the days when the Miami Herald won a Pulitzer Prize for in-depth investigation of the Miami mayor’s race in 1997. The Herald revealed so much fraud (some of it involving absentee ballots), that the election was overturned by a court.
Read the entire column here.
One thought on “Today’s highly interesting read (06/01/22): The Fraud that Dare Not Speak its Name”
Pingback: The White house in one word; the 2020 fraud; Reagan and grief; Catholic politicians and abortion | This Just In… From Franklin, WI