Was Franklin wrong to hold an open Common Council meeting this week?

On Monday of this week on the eve of Election Day the Franklin Common Council held its regular meeting in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The meeting was live streamed by the Franklin Economic Development Commission and was open to the public. Other than the mayor, some council members and city staff the meeting was poorly attended by the general public with less than a handful of citizens present.

Opening the citizen comment period of the meeting, Franklin mayoral candidate Basil Ryan said he was troubled the proceedings were scheduled.

“I didn’t see anything on the agenda that was pressing,” said Ryan as he addressed the council. “What’s alarming is that people are staying home, people are out of work, and people are looking at this meeting tonight and asking why.”

An angry Alderman Dan Mayer also objected.

“Public safety should be our first priority,” said Mayer during discussion on an agenda item relating to city impact fees.  “This is ridiculous. This should be postponed. There should not be a question about it.”

Was Ryan right? Was Mayer right?

I agree with an analysis by Jed Pressgove of Governing.com who writes:

Local governments have a legal obligation to keep conducting business and engaging the public during the global pandemic.”

Social distancing was followed carefully at Franklin’s meeting. If people wanted to attend it was their choice to make. Despite Ryan and Mayer’s objections Franklin had a very good idea to take advantage of modern technology to handle its scheduled responsibilities.  The concept will probably be utilized again. Hopefully the city will rectify its sound system issues.

Pressgove of Governing.com adds there are important considerations when holding a virtual meeting. You can read his column, “Pandemic Forces Local Governments’ Hands into Era of Virtual Public Meetings.”

One thought on “Was Franklin wrong to hold an open Common Council meeting this week?

  1. Putting Common Council meetings into the residents homes, especially with a record of poor attendance, is a good idea. For one, it somewhat prevents “stacking the deck” by council members when they want to ram through a proposal that is very controversial with residents and would be shouted down. They like to use this kind of manipulation when they anticipate poor attendance at a particular council meeting.

    Re. “The Speaker System”: This should have been corrected long ago! I believe the mayor and other council members like the appalling sound system as the audience misses a lot of what they are saying, especially when they deliberately do not put their mouth close to the mike (especially the mayor).

    Ohh, those outlandish small-town councils!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s