Taylor’s Take: Patti Logsdon’s Rough First Day

Image may contain: 3 people, including Steve F. Taylor, people sitting, people standing and indoor

By Guest Blogger, Franklin Alderman and former Milwaukee County Supervisor Steve Taylor. The opinions expressed are those of Steve Taylor and not necessarily those of Kevin Fischer.

I appreciate Kevin’s offer to guest blog on topics I want to express my opinion on.  Considering that I just endured a brutal election, it can’t be a surprise that my first blog is about my observations of Patti Logsdon’s first day on the job and the Board meeting itself.  Elections have consequences and the voters decided they wanted to go in a different direction, but let’s not forget how Logsdon was elected.  Over $150,000 was spent by County Executive Chris Abele to remove me from office.  Forget that I voted the right way and delivered countless projects that benefited the district, or that if I wasn’t in office, the Ballpark Commons project would not happen.  Nope, Abele doesn’t like criticism so he used his wealth to eliminate it.

Throughout the campaign we heard very little, if anything, from Logsdon as her surrogate Deanna Alexander did the majority of the talking for her.  So it is not surprising that at Logsdon’s first meeting she appeared dazed and confused. When the roll call (attendance) was taking place, Dan Sebring had to give a nudge to remind her that her name was called.

Logsdon’s first official action was to vote for Chairman of the Board Theodore Lipscomb who ran unopposed.  You would think this was an easy decision wouldn’t you?  I guess it wasn’t as Alexander announced that she was abstaining and gave some half-baked reason why.  What did Logsdon do when it came to the actual vote?  You guessed it . . . she also abstained, and the final vote was 16-0-2.  Logsdon attempted to give her rationale before the vote; however, it was ruled out-of-order by County Clerk George Christenson.  Interesting that after her complaints that I wasn’t able to get along with others, Logsdon found an odd way to endear herself with her new colleagues.

I found the vote for first vice-chair unusual as Alexander and Logsdon voted for Marcelia Nicholson over Jim “Luigi” Schmitt.  Both brag about their conservative credentials yet voted for an extremely liberal member over one who is considered a right-leaning moderate.  Nicholson, who has two years on the Board, has consistently supported living wage ordinances and frankly everything else you would expect from a liberal; while Schmitt, the most senior member with 19 plus years of service, is an extremely fiscal conservative.

Alexander struck again when it came to the vote for second vice-chair.  Sequanna Taylor was the only supervisor who filed to run but that didn’t stop Alexander from nominating Sebring.  Her rationale was “I believe that Supervisor Sebring has been a man of few words on our body, but when he does speak I have noticed that the entire body listens.”  Sorry Alexander, the body wasn’t listening but rather shocked that Sebring was actually saying something.  When he did speak, it was usually about his loss of money because he wasn’t turning wrenches or driving for Lyft.

The rest of the day didn’t go so well for Logsdon either as sources tell me she got locked out of her office twice.  Hopefully that won’t happen again as she has already moved from her assigned office to an office right next door to Alexander.  My guess is the puppet master wants her puppet close by.  Maybe they will ask for an adjoining door.

In future blogs, when I decide to write, my focus will not be on the deficiencies of Logsdon as I believe her lack of action and lack of results will speak for itself.  I will continue to remain active, stay involved on issues that I care about, communicate with my former colleagues and add insight on matters involving the county on the Steve Scaffidi Show on WTMJ Radio.  Politics is a business and business can be rough.  The County Board is not a place for beginners – it is quite diverse, liberal and conservative, urban and suburban.

I leave you with this – a former colleague (who will remain unnamed) summed up Logsdon’s first day saying, “It was the worst performance ever by an elected official.”  That comment says a lot and I remind you that elections have consequences!

5 thoughts on “Taylor’s Take: Patti Logsdon’s Rough First Day

  1. Pingback: Why this Patti Logsdon stumble on her first day in office is a big deal | This Just In… From Franklin, WI

  2. Wow.

    If this isn’t the most childish, whinny, petty-filled post I’ve ever read. Just Wow.

    From what I just read I can understand why you lost. I’m glad I live in Oak Creek and can also understand why Franklin is in the position they have been in for the past 15 years.

    Ald. Taylor, I would suggest you take the down-time you have now to sit down with a professional councilor and take a serious personal inventory and listen to what that person has to say..


    • Sounds like sour grapes! I was not influenced by the mailings I received in the Milw. County Supervisor District 9 race. I voted for Logsdon both times she ran against Taylor. Taylor appears to be a megalomaniac who does not belong in politics. With his explosive and vindictive disposition, it does appear he will need to seek professional help to get his life on track.


  3. Pingback: My Most Popular Blogs (04/23/18) | This Just In… From Franklin, WI

  4. . Ballpark Commons is already behind and asking for 5.2 million additional tax dollars to build on a toxic waste site. . It is half of what the developer, your friend proposed. And now taxes will continue to go up with the senior / memory apartments who utilize city services. There are 600 apartments in the near area. It seems that perhaps the market could support apartments when this plan was drawn up however now it seems the market is saturated. Additionally, why would one choose to live across from a noisy , light polluted area. I am truly worried that this project is going to fail.
    One last thing. In my real estate experience never have I seen an apartment building much less an assisted living apartment building be considered an anchor for a sports project. An anchor generally brings business in. Why woulld renters bring in sports business? I hope for the sake of our wonderful city that I am wrong. Best of luck to the council in making these difficult decisions. I hope you are all able to look at the facts and make unbiased decisions for the sake of all of the taxpayers. Thank you for listening to my concerns.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s